The Current State of Gen Z in Nepali Politics
In the past month, Nepal has witnessed significant changes in its political landscape. However, the Gen Z groups remain as fragmented as ever. Even before the September 8 protests, several groups had emerged, each claiming to be the true leader of the movement. These groups often had conflicting objectives, and this situation continues to persist. In the midst of this confusion, other forces have attempted to take control of the Gen Z movement and undermine its main goals.
The interim government, which is responsible for organizing elections in March 2026, is now struggling to manage these divided Gen Z groups. On Saturday, for example, President Ramchandra Paudel invited 20 individuals representing Gen Z to a meeting at his office. This move, however, led to protests from other Gen Z groups who felt excluded. They went as far as labeling Sudan Gurung, a representative from Hami Nepal, an organization active during and after the Gen Z protests, as a “foreign agent” and “anti-national.” Some protesters even demanded the resignation of Prime Minister Sushila Karki. Other Gen Z representatives were also criticized in various ways.
Outraged protesters vowed to return to the streets if they continued to be ignored in discussions with the government. Such divisions among Gen Z representatives are dangerous. Not only do regressive elements try to regain power by exploiting these divisions, but as long as Gen Z groups remain split, they will struggle to convince Nepali voters who have been seeking political stability. In short, what is happening within the Gen Z groups is a major deviation from their core agenda of clean and accountable governance.
The Need for Unity and Clarity
It is high time that Gen Z groups engage in some self-reflection and work out their differences privately. However, there are certain things that must be clear. In the name of Gen Z representation, demands such as the restoration of monarchy should not be accepted. Any radical reforms regarding the government form or state structure must be approved by the sovereign legislature. Therefore, if some want to see the monarchy restored or an executive president, they must campaign for these agendas in the upcoming elections. At this moment, the focus should be on ensuring that the March 5 elections are as free and fair as possible. Failing to do so could have serious consequences.
Who Should Represent Gen Z?
When it comes to who should represent Nepal’s Gen Z in meetings with the government, there are several considerations. Extremists of all kinds should be excluded. So should regressive elements. The representative group must also be inclusive, reflecting the country’s rich diversity. If the spirit of change ignited by the sacrifices of many young people is lost due to internal divisions, it would be devastating. On the other hand, the biggest tribute Gen Z representatives can give is helping the government overcome obstacles to hold timely elections. The strong presence of Gen Z candidates and parties will be the final touch on this effort.